Skip to main content

Mad March?


Well, perhaps just a little deranged, thinking of Mad March Hares.
But of course they're not at all.  Performing, so that they might look a bit mad, playing a role yes, but no, not mad.

However, pretending to be a little mad - which confers certain privileges if you're a human - can be useful if you're being entertaining if not outrageous, irreverent if not sacrilegious.  Then not-quite-acceptable, perhaps even disgraceful remarks may be seen as no more than slightly irresponsible as you provide laughs, a diversion, or even (or especially) an insight...

Now we're moving into an interesting area.  Poets often grant themselves this permission, as of course do comedians. 

Which brings the role of the Jester to mind - the classic stand-up, generating their own material on the spot in response to the conversation and company, risk-taking for sure, but in sailing so close to the wind, they travel fast, free and light - and impress the onlookers.

When, I wonder, and indeed why, did we abandon the Jester?
Or perhaps (certain politicians cannot be included, as the Jester has no power except that granted to him to entertain) we haven't?

Simplest to look back to those times when the Jester was, well, king. 


Will Somers Carries On...

I am a jester.  Good king Henry’s
the source of my sauce, the role for my royalties.
I Will bring light and warmth from my season –
to all and sundry something of Somers:
be you clouded or sodden, whatever the weather –
whether your son is shining or whether
the reigning gives you rheum and chill,
as a rule, Will will bring good folk good will.

You may rely upon my puns,
rocky rhymes and feeble reason,
rhythms that will trip you up –
my queries, quips and quiddities,
juggles, jests and jolly jokes –
they all live on, although
I lied and died in 1560. Still laughing

Will survives, which is jester’s
well – you yet have need of Will:
without a will, we have no future.
Kings and Queens have come and gone –
(make your own will, incidentally) –
I’ll continue – my trusty monkey
chattering on, chasing fleas…
the work of monarchs if you please,
for I suggest life’s just a jest.



Interestingly, exploiting ambiguities, using puns, rhymes, assonances and alliterations and even malapropisms (is that word itself wrong, being anachronistic?) - all the stuff of the Jester - are tools in the poetry box too.

Sadly, many of the examples of Somers' humour hardly raise a smile now.  But perhaps that doesn't matter, as he was obviously a great laugh then.  Although the two portraits of him both show a serious looking fellow - more like a poet actually, than a stand-up.

Still, he carries his monkey on his shoulder, like a Pullman daemon - his prop, identification and reminder. 

Personally, I'd like a hare, mad or not.
But I'm sure it wouldn't stay there - it would be off to run around in the fields, and have a scrap - slightly madly.



PS If you love hares, you might find this interesting

http://www.chrischapmanphotography.co.uk/hares/page8.htm

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A plague on all these houses

It's a great poem, Lowell's For the Union Dead. I only recently came across it - at least, that's what I thought - but it's been grunting (I choose the word advisedly) away in my head ever since, especially that fourth verse. Behind their cage, yellow dinosaur steam shovels were grunting as they cropped up tone of mush and grass to gouge their underworld garage. It took a little while for me to realise why. Before (I thought) I'd read it, I wrote a poem about the new housing estates springing up round our little town. I was thinking about the various creatures that had lived on the field that was to be covered with houses - sheep primarily - and then those that were to follow. The first were, well, a sort of dinosaur. Here's my second verse: At first it was the one-armed monsters, set free within their caged arena to trundle round, and gently paw the ground, then pile up mounds of earth accompanied by Lego men. I was pleased

My blog this month isn't a poem – nor even several...

  My blog this month isn't a poem – nor even several. No, this time it's a set of little films of poems. After sharing them with several of you, I apologise straight away if you've already seen them, but you might be interested to hear some thoughts on the matter. And if you don't want to hear me thinking about making films of poems, just ignore what follows and go straight to the YouTube link.   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qbwJYkDeGIs&list=PLbC1BOoALpN-xyuGJCIAqJjImAi1aAfrY   I hope you enjoy the films. And please tell me what you think! You may remember a couple of the poems appearing in past blogs, with me writing about the possible presentation of poetry in this way. Time was when poetry existed solely as the spoken or sung word – it took some time for it to be written down.  Now, for the most part, it exists and flourishes in both these forms. Recently, and refreshingly, it seems to have been recovering more of its original orality. Now we liv

The Signpost

Here’s a signpost – originally distinctive, being unique and handmade, and now even more so, with the evidence of ageing.   … numbers, distances, which way? While all signposts are interesting in their duty to inform, their presentation of choices and their simple declarative presence, I find this one special. It’s not just that it has much to say in terms of where you actually are, in which direction you might choose to go, how far your destination is (down to quarter mile accuracy) and even if your chosen method of transport is suitable. It’s also special in the simple elegance of its design, with the arms’ supports and the bevelled edges of the main post rising to that unexpected point. But the specialness goes further.  My friend James Ravilious took me there just at this time of year, over twenty years ago.  It was then upright and brilliant white, with crisp black letters. He certainly thought it was special, photographing it lovingly, in May 1988 ( Chawleigh Week Cross –